Agriculture and rural development form an integral part of India's
development strategy, even in these days of electronic and
telecommunication revolution that is having an edge over other
development instruments. Rural development has been a sine qua non in
the process of accelerating the pace of economic development and
significantly improving the standard and quality of living of rural
households. It is needless to emphasize that credit is a vital input for
accelerating the pace of development of the rural economy through
financing of agriculture and allied activities. Rural infrastructure and
poverty alleviation programmes are meant for the weaker sections of the
rural population.Majority of the rural folk are not able to meet their
day-to-day requirements from their own sources of income, not to speak
of investments in other productive enterprises for improving their
economic conditions. Therefore, they have to depend on various financial
agencies for arranging funds for making investment. Rural credit in
India is a part and parcel of its economic development. Rural population
is composed of agricultural producers, tenant cultivators, village
artisans and landless labours. All these categories are in need of
credit.
Dr.M.Selvakumar
Assistant Professor Post Graduate Department of Commerce
Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College Sivakasi,Tamil Nadu umaselvakumar@yahoo.co.in
A Study On
Reverse Mortgage Of SBI
The concept of Reverse Mortgage (RM) is gaining momentum in India with
the Finance Minister P. Chidambaram giving his nod in the Union Budget
for 2007-08. Subsequently, the National Housing Bank (NHB), a subsidiary
of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), released the guidelines. This had
led several banks to announce their intentions to launch the scheme.
Taking the lead, Dewan Housing Finance Limited (DFHL) followed by Punjab
National Bank (PNB) and Bank of Baroda (BOB), States Bank of India (SBI),
etc. announced the scheme aimed at senior citizens.In a regular
mortgage, a borrower mortgages his new/existing house with the lender in
return for the loan amount, the same is charged at a particular interest
rate and runs over a predetermined tenure. The borrower then has to
repay the loan amount in the form of Equated Monthly Installments (EMIs),
which comprise of both principal and interest amounts. The property is
utilized as a security to cover the risk of default on the borrower's
part.
N.Sravanthi Associate Professor
Department of Business Management
St.Ann's PG College For Women Hyderabad sravanthi_stanns@yahoo.co.in
Technical And Financial Parameters Effect
Concession Period: A Study
Inadequate transport infrastructure has been recognized as an impediment
to the industrial and economic progress of any country. Governments
worldwide invariably must cope with the widening gap between needed
investments and available budgetary resources. They increasingly attempt
to involve the private sector in the financing, design, construction, and
operation of major infrastructure projects, with a view to exploit the
private initiatives to implement public projects. In this context, the
BOT concept is becoming a popular mode of privatization of transport
infrastructure development (Tiong 1990)1.In recent years, governments in
many countries have begun privatizing transportation infrastructure
sectors .Some of the forces driving this movement include a scarcity of
public resources, an increase in the demand for better service and a
political trend toward the deregulation of infrastructures from public
monopoly. Although the discussion and case study relate to conditions in
municipalities in India, the inferences are likely to be of interest to
transport infrastructure managers in developing countries and to those
interested in the globalization of BOT projects.
Swapan Kumar Bagui Ph.D Scholar
Department of Civil Engineering Bengal Engineering & Science
University Howrah,West Bengal swapanbagui@gmail.com
Dr.Ambarish Ghosh Professor Department of Civil Engineering
Bengal Engineering & Science University Howrah,West Bengal
Disinvestment Of Public Sector Undertakings In
India-An Impact Study
In the post independence era, the newly elected Government of our
country felt the need for rapid industrialization and rebuilding the
nation from its under developed state caused by the British rule. With
this end in view, the Government took the lead and introduced five year
plans to achieve progress in industry, agriculture, health, education
and many other allied sectors contributing to economic development.
Governments at central and state level set aside a large portion of its
resources for the purpose of promoting Public Sector Undertakings(PSU)
which are owned and controlled by the Government. During this period,
large number of PSU's sprang up in entire spectrum of industrial
activities ranging from infra development to food and agriculture based
sectors. Being a mixed economy, the Government also encouraged private
investment in industrial field. The key feature of business activity
during that period was the absence of competition between public and
private sector through a system of reservation, licensing and import
barriers. This has gradually reduced the efficiency of both public and
private sector of our country in the later years.
Dr.M.K.Ramakrishnan Lecturer Zamorin's
Guruvayurappan College Calicut,Kerala
Sandhya R. Research Scholar Department of Commerce
Zamorin's Guruvayurappan College Calicut,Kerala
Managing Crisis To Recovery: The Road Ahead For
India
According to Prof. James Van Horne of Stanford University, credit crisis
in US, often caused or accompanied by real estate collapses, occurred on
an average once every 14 years from 1800 to 1970s and once every 8 years
since 1970. During the panic of 1819, real estate speculation involved
farmland on the Ohio frontier. In the panic of 1837, there was a real
estate bubble along the Mississipi. The panic of 1873 and 1893 involved
investments in land near rail lines. The crash of 1929 was preceded by
the bursting of real estate bubbles in Florida & Southern California.
After 9/11, American people were encouraged to spend in the spirit of
patriotism to help restart the failing economy. To fuel that spending,
in the extraordinary political and psychological climate of that time,
U.S. policy makers actively encouraged levels of borrowing and lending
that would never have been allowed otherwise. Federal reserve cut
interest rate to 1%, the financial services industry sensed that a lot
of money could be made and went over-vigorously in real estate,
seemingly unaware that low interest rate could be disguising larger
risks. Commercial banks and investment banks lent for house purchases
and consumer loans to borrowers who were not really equipped to repay.
The easy lending pushed up housing prices, which then went up still
higher, when speculators bought houses on the expedition of further
price increases. The price rose significantly because of easier access
to funds/loans as also historically low interest rate, looser lending,
low appraisal standards and documentation. When the easy lending
initially slowed and eventually stopped during 2006-07, housing prices
peaked. However, once interest rates began to rise and housing prices
started to drop moderately, refinancing became more difficult.Defaults
and foreclosure activity increased dramatically as easy initial terms
expired, home prices failed to go up as anticipated, and interest rates
reset higher and this triggered a global financial crisis through 2007
and 2008. In the world economic forum annual meeting in Dalian, a
Chinese participant remarked, "The teachers have made big mistakes."
(Martin Wolf, Financial Times, Sep 14' 09).
Divya Srivastava Research Scholar Faculty of Management Studies Banaras Hindu University Varanasi,Uttar Pradesh divyasri_28@rediffmail.com
Dr.Shashi Srivastava Lecturer Faculty of Management Studies Banaras Hindu University Varanasi,Uttar Pradesh
Significant Level of Financial Risk On Capital
Structure
Finance is to play a vital role in all organizations and so, it leads
the finance department to be a team player which is constructively
involved in all operations of the sector. While analyzing the financial
problems of an organization, the principal contents of the financial
management can be said to be, i) How large should enterprises be and how
fast should it grow? ii) In what form should it hold assets? And iii)
What should be the composition of its liabilities? These three questions
deal with the major financial problems of the firm. As such, the
financial manager is concerned with the solution of three major problems
relating to financial operations of the firm corresponding to
investment, financing and dividend decisions. Of these three decisions,
the most important decision to be made by the financial manager is
decisions on financing. Broadly, finance personnel must decide when,
where, and how to acquire funds to meet the investment needs of the
firm. The central issue before the finance personnel is to determine the
proportion of equity and debt with the effects of financial and
operating risk factors. The combination of debt and equity is known as
the capital structure of the firm. The finance personnel must strive to
obtain the best financing combinations or the optimum capital structure
for the firm.
Dr.K.Jothi Faculty of Commerce
Karpagam University
Coimbatore,Tamil Nadu