New IJF now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Indian Journal of Finance logo

Indian Journal of Finance

ISSN: 0973-8711 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2007 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Evaluation of Pooled Cross-Sectional Earnings Forecasting Models: An Indian Evidence

Sanket Ledwani1,  Suman Chakraborty2

1 Doctoral Student, Department of Commerce, MIT Campus, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka

2 Professor , Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management and Commerce, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur - 303 007, Rajasthan

Volume 17
Issue 8
Pages 8–26
Year 2023
Received: Jan. 15, 2023 Accepted: June 25, 2023 Published: Aug. 31, 2023
Abstract

Purpose: Earnings forecasts are essential for valuation, and a bleak coverage of analysts’ forecasts in emerging economies withholds the valuation research and practices. This study compared the pooled cross-sectional earnings forecasting models in the Indian market to choose alternative sources for earnings forecasts to solve the unavailability of analysts’ earnings forecasts. Specifically, evaluating the theoretical earnings forecasting models of three different propositions: the earnings persistence (Li & Mohanram, 2014, EP) model, the Hou, Van Dijk, and Zhang (2012, HVZ) model, and the Pope and Wang (Harris & Wang, 2019, PW) model.

Methodology: This study considered all companies listed on NSE from 1995 – 2022 in an unbalanced panel structure with 36,591 firm years observations. Robust regression was used for the coefficient estimation because of its capability to handle outliers and provide a better model fit.

Findings: The results showed that the pooled cross-sectional models are reasonably accurate with the Indian data, restricting average forecast errors between 3% to 10%. The coefficient of earnings greater than one across models signified a high persistence in earnings. The PW model outperformed the other two models in the short run with share prices as predictor variables; whereas, the EP model performed best in the long run. The PW and EP forecast offered incremental information fully encompassing the HVZ forecast.Practical

Implications: This study elevated the application of valuation in theories in research and managerial practices where firms’earnings forecasts are an essential input.

Originality: This study uniquely compared the earning forecasting models of three proportions in a single setup to validate and suggest sources of earnings forecast for the Indian capital market.

Keywords Model-Based Earnings Forecast Mechanical Earnings Forecast Robust Regression Cross-Sectional Models Earnings Persistence
How to Cite

Sanket Ledwani, Suman Chakraborty (2023). Evaluation of Pooled Cross-Sectional Earnings Forecasting Models: An Indian Evidence. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(8), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i8/173008

References
  1. Aggarwal, R., Mishra, D., & Wilson, C. (2018). Analyst recommendations and the implied cost of equity. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 50(3), 717–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0644-y
  2. Andersen, R. (2008). Modern methods for robust regression. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985109
  3. Ashton, D., & Wang, P. (2013). Terminal valuations, growth rates and the implied cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(1), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-012-9208-5
  4. Azevedo, V., Bielstein, P., & Gerhart, M. (2021). Earnings forecasts: The case for combining analysts' estimates with a cross-sectional model. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 56(2), 545–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-020-00902-z
  5. Azevedo, V. G., & Gerhart, M. (2016). Comparison of cross-sectional earnings forecasting models for the European market. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2787277
  6. Bradshaw, M. T., Drake, M. S., Myers, J. N., & Myers, L. A. (2012). A re-examination of analysts' superiority over time-series forecasts of annual earnings. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(4), 944–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-012-9185-8
  7. Brown, L. D. (1993). Earnings forecasting research: Its implications for capital markets research. International Journal of Forecasting, 9(3), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(93)90023-G
  8. Brown, L. D., & Zhou, L. (2015). Interactions between analysts' and managers' earnings forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 31(2), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.10.002
  9. Brownen-Trinh, R. (2019). Effects of winsorization: The cases of forecasting non-GAAP and GAAP earnings. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(1–2), 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12365
  10. Chacko, J. P., & Padmakumari, L. (2023). Does ownership structure affect the ex-ante cost of capital? Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.21511/IMFI.20(1).2023.11
  11. Chang, W.-J., Monahan, S. J., Ouazad, A., & Vasvari, F. P. (2021). The higher moments of future earnings. The Accounting Review, 96(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2015-0413
  12. Claus, J., & Thomas, J. (2001). Equity premia as low as three percent? Evidence from analysts' earnings forecasts for domestic and international stock markets. The Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1629–1666. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00384
  13. Easton, P. D. (2004). PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review, 79(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.73
  14. Easton, P. D., & Monahan, S. J. (2005). An evaluation of accounting-based measures of expected returns. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 501–538. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.501
  15. Easton, P. D., & Monahan, S. J. (2016). Review of recent research on improving earnings forecasts and evaluating accounting-based estimates of the expected rate of return on equity capital. Abacus, 52(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12064
  16. Easton, P. D., & Sommers, G. A. (2007). Effect of analysts' optimism on estimates of the expected rate of return implied by earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(5), 983–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00257.x
  17. Echterling, F., Eierle, B., & Ketterer, S. (2015). A review of the literature on methods of computing the implied cost of capital. International Review of Financial Analysis, 42, 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.08.001
  18. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2000). Forecasting profitability and earnings. The Journal of Business, 73(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/209638
  19. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2006). Profitability, investment and average returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 491–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.009
  20. Feng, M. (2014). Discussion of “Evaluating cross-sectional forecasting models for implied cost of capital.” Review of Accounting Studies, 19(3), 1186–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-014-9288-5
  21. Gebhardt, W. R., Lee, C. M., & Swaminathan, B. (2001). Toward an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 135–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00007
  22. Gerakos, J. J., & Gramacy, R. B. (2012). Regression-based earnings forecasts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2112137
  23. Griffin, J. M. (2002). Are the Fama and French factors global or country specific? The Review of Financial Studies, 15(3), 783–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.3.783
  24. Harris, R. D., & Wang, P. (2019). Model-based earnings forecasts vs. financial analysts' earnings forecasts. The British Accounting Review, 51(4), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.10.002
  25. Hess, D., Meuter, M., & Kaul, A. (2019). The performance of mechanical earnings forecasts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3041364
  26. Hou, K., & Van Dijk, M. A. (2010). Profitability shocks and the size effect in the cross-section of expected stock returns. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1536804
  27. Hou, K., van Dijk, M. A., & Zhang, Y. (2012). The implied cost of capital: A new approach. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.12.001
  28. Huber, P. J. (1973). Robust regression: Asymptotics, conjectures and Monte Carlo. The Annals of Statistics, 1(5), 799–821. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176342503
  29. Iqbal, & Mallikarjunappa, T. (2010). A study of efficiency of the Indian stock market. Indian Journal of Finance, 4(5), 32–38. https://www.indianjournaloffinance.co.in/index.php/IJF/article/view/72610
  30. Kamath, A. N., Shenoy, S. S., & Kumar, N. S. (2022). An overview of investor sentiment: Identifying themes, trends, and future direction through bibliometric analysis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(3), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(3).2022.19
  31. Kordzakhia, N., Mishra, G. D., & Reiersølmoen, L. (2001). Robust estimation in the logistic regression model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 98(1–2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00312-8
  32. Kumar, V. P., & Kar, S. (2021). Measuring efficiency of selected Indian commercial banks: A DEA-based MPI approach. Indian Journal of Finance, 15(5–7), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/IJF/2021/V15I5-7/164492
  33. Kundu, S., & Banerjee, A. (2021). Predictability of earnings and its impact on stock returns: Evidence from India. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1898112. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1898112
  34. Ledwani, S., Chakraborty, S., & Digal, S. K. (2022). The evolution of Indian Journal of Finance : A retrospective review and future directions. Indian Journal of Finance, 16(4), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2022/v16i4/169172
  35. Leone, A. J., Minutti-Meza, M., & Wasley, C. E. (2019). Influential observations and inference in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 94(6), 337–364. https://doi.org/10.2308/ACCR-52396
  36. Li, K. K. (2011). How well do investors understand loss persistence? Review of Accounting Studies, 16(3), 630–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11142-011-9157-4
  37. Li, K. K., & Mohanram, P. (2014). Evaluating cross-sectional forecasting models for implied cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(3), 1152–1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-014-9282-y
  38. Lithin, B. M., Chakraborty, S., & Nikhil, M. N. (2023). Are liquidity and credit risk key determinants of corporate credit spreads (CCS) in India? Indian Journal of Finance, 17(6), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/IJF/2023/V17I6/172773
  39. Mainrai, G., & Mohania, S. (2021). Rising profits and falling market share - A case of National Bank. Indian Journal of Finance, 15(5–7), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.17010/IJF/2021/V15I5-7/164494
  40. Mincer, J. A., & Zarnowitz, V. (1969). The evaluation of economic forecasts. In, Economic forecasts and expectations (NBER). https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c1214/c1214.pdf
  41. Mishra, D. R., & O'Brien, T. J. (2019). Fama-French, CAPM, and implied cost of equity. Journal of Economics and Business, 101, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.08.002
  42. Mohanram, P., & Gode, D. (2013). Removing predictable analyst forecast errors to improve implied cost of equity estimates. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(2), 443–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-012-9219-2
  43. Monahan, S. J. (2018). Financial statement analysis and earnings forecasting. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 12(2), 105–215. https://doi.org/10.1561/1400000036
  44. Nikhil, M. N., Chakraborty, S., Lithin, B. M., & Lobo, L. S. (2023). Does the adoption of Ind AS affect the performance of firms in India? Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(2).2023.15
  45. O'brien, P. C. (1988). Analysts' forecasts as earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(88)90023-7
  46. Paton, A. P., Cannavan, D., Gray, S., & Hoang, K. (2020). Analyst versus model-based earnings forecasts: Implied cost of capital applications. Accounting & Finance, 60(4), 4061–4092. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12548
  47. Penman, S. (2016). Valuation: Accounting for risk and the expected return. Abacus, 52(1), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12067
  48. Pope, P. F., & Wang, P. (2005). Earnings components, accounting bias and equity valuation. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-4207-4
  49. Qu, L. (2021). A new approach to estimating earnings forecasting models: Robust regression MM-estimation. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(2), 1011–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.11.003
  50. Richardson, S. A., Sloan, R. G., Soliman, M. T., & Tuna, I. (2005). Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(3), 437–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.005
  51. Sen, P. K. (1968). Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's Tau. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324), 1379–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934
  52. Sen, R., & Mehrotra, P. (2016). Modeling jumps and volatility of the Indian stock market using high-frequency data. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 14(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40953-016-0028-5
  53. Sinha, R. K. (2021). Macro disagreement and analyst forecast properties. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 17(1), 100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2020.100235
  54. Sneed, J. E. (1996). Earnings forecasting models: Adding a theoretical foundation for the selection of explanatory variables. Management Research News, 19(11), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028504
  55. Theil, H. (1950). A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis. Nederlandse Akademie Wetenchappen, Series A, 53, 386–392.
  56. Tripathi, M., Kashiramka, S., & Jain, P. K. (2018). Equity risk premium in India: Comparative estimates from historical returns, dividend and earnings models. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 17(1_suppl), S136–S156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972652717751543
  57. Venkataramanaiah, M., Latha, C. M., & Rao, K. S. (2018). Determinants of dividend policy in the Indian corporate sector: A study of companies listed on Nifty 50, NSE. Indian Journal of Finance, 12(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2018/v12i1/120740
  58. Wang, P., & Huang, W. (2015). The implied growth rates and country risk premium: Evidence from Chinese stock markets. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 45(3), 641–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-014-0450-8
  59. Yohai, V. J. (1987). High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. The Annals of Statistics, 15(2), 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176350366
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJF

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines