New IJF now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Indian Journal of Finance logo

Indian Journal of Finance

ISSN: 0973-8711 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2007 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Moderating Role of Stock Return Volatility in Corporate Governance–Firm Value Structural Linkages : Insights from a PLS-SEM with IPMA Approach

Raj Kumar Singh1,  Naresh Kumar2,  Yashvardhan Singh3,  Ajay Kumar4,  Sunil Kumar5

1 Professor, Department of Commerce, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla - 171 005, Himachal Pradesh

2 Assistant Professor, Government Degree College, Diggal, Solan, Himachal Pradesh

3 Data Analyst, Axtria Pvt. Ltd., Noida, Uttar Pradesh

4 Assistant Professor, Government Degree College, Tissa, Chamba, Himachal Pradesh

5 Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla - 171 005, Himachal Pradesh

Volume 19
Issue 1
Pages 8–32
Year 2025
Received: July 15, 2024 Accepted: Dec. 5, 2024 Published: Jan. 1, 2025
Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the structural linkages between corporate governance (CG) and firm value (FV) through financial performance (FP) and CEO-duality (CEOD) as mediating and stock return volatility (SRV) as moderating constructs.Design/

Methodology: This research utilized secondary data derived from the annual reports of listed companies spanning the period from 2011–2012 to 2023–2024, comprising 520 company-year observations. It adopted an advanced methodological approach, a Smart partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA), within a panel data framework.

Findings: The findings elucidated that CG and CEOD positively and significantly impacted firm value, while FP had a positive but insignificant impact. CEOD positively and significantly mediated the CG–FV structural relationship, whereas FP mediated this relationship positively but insignificantly. The combined mediating effect of CEOD and FP was also positive but insignificant. SRV negatively and significantly moderated the CG – FV relationship.Practical/Social

Implications: Effective governance boosts profitability and trustworthiness, enabling companies to attract more cost-effective capital. Improved performance yields two key benefits: high tax revenue for the government and greater CSR spending, both promoting sustainable development goals and socio-economic prosperity.Theoretical

Implications: The findings demonstrated that resource dependence theory complemented agency theory while challenging the theoretical foundations of the stewardship theory.Originality/

Value: This is a novel study that examined CG–FV structural linkages of the listed companies in India, utilizing the PLS-SEM methodology with IPMA.

Keywords corporate governance firm value CEO-duality stock return volatility financial performance. JEL Classification Code
How to Cite

Raj Kumar Singh, Naresh Kumar, Yashvardhan Singh, Ajay Kumar, Sunil Kumar (2025). Moderating Role of Stock Return Volatility in Corporate Governance–Firm Value Structural Linkages : Insights from a PLS-SEM with IPMA Approach. Indian Journal of Finance, 19(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2025/v19i1/174693

References
  1. Abdullah, H., & Tursoy, T. (2023). The effect of corporate governance on financial performance: Evidence from a shareholder-oriented system. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal of Management Studies), 16(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijms.2022.321510.674798
  2. Adekunle, S. A., & Aghedo, E. M. (2014). Corporate governance and financial performance of selected quoted companies in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(9), 53–60. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/11758
  3. Ali, R., Liu, Y., & Niazi, G. R. (2017). Corporate governance and performance of peer firms: A cross-lagged analysis of an emerging economy. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 33(3), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v33i3.9946
  4. Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006
  5. Biswas, S., Bhattacharya, M., Sadarangani, P. H., & Jin, J. Y. (2022). Corporate governance and earnings management in banks: An empirical evidence from India. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), Article ID 2085266. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2085266
  6. Chhaochharia, V., & Grinstein, Y. (2007). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of 2002 governance rules. Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.556990
  7. Chow, Y. P., Muhammad, J., Bany-Ariffin, A. N., & Cheng, F. F. (2018). Macroeconomic uncertainty, corporate governance and corporate capital structure. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 14(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-08-2017-0156
  8. Christensen, J., Kent, P., & Stewart, J. (2010). Corporate governance and company performance in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 20(4), 372–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00108.x
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  10. Dang, G. T., Huu, A. N., & Nguyen, T. P. (2023). Impact of corporate governance on firm value: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Challenges: Strategic Adaptation in the World of Uncertainties (ICECH 2022) (pp. 60–76). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-150-0_5
  11. Das, S. C. (2022). Corporate governance in India: An evaluation (6th ed.). PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
  12. DeAngelo, H., & Roll, R. (2013). How stable are corporate capital structures? Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1784204
  13. Debnath, P., Das, P., Laskar, N., Khan, S. B., Dhand, S., & Kaushal, K. (2021). CEO duality and firm performance: An empirical study on listed companies from an emerging market [Special issue]. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 5(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv5i2sip7
  14. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
  15. ElGammal, W., El-Kassar, A.-N., & Messarra, L. C. (2018). Corporate ethics, governance and social responsibility in MENA countries. Management Decision, 56(1), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2017-0287
  16. Eni-Egwu, C. O., James, M. C., & Beatrice, E. C. (2022). Impact of selected corporate governance variables on the financial performance of selected quoted deposit money banks in Nigeria. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum733
  17. Ferriswara, D., Sayidah, N., & Buniarto, E. A. (2022). Do corporate governance, capital structure predict financial performance and firm value? (Empirical Study of Jakarta Islamic Index). Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), Article ID 2147123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2147123
  18. Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.278920
  19. Guo, Z., & Kga, U. K. (2012). Corporate governance and firm performance of listed firms in Sri Lanka. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 664–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.246
  20. Gupta, L., & Maurya, S. (2021). Board composition and underpricing: The role of business experts, support specialists, community influentials, and gender diversity. Indian Journal of Finance, 15(11), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2021/v15i11/160392
  21. Gwala, R. S., & Mashau, P. (2023). Tracing the evolution of agency theory in corporate governance. In N. Baporikar (ed.), Governance as a catalyst for public sector sustainability (pp. 260–285). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6966-8.ch013
  22. Hai, L. T. (2024). The effect of financial performance, CSR and corporate governance on firm value. Economics, Finance and Management Review, 1(17), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5208-2024-1-68
  23. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed). SAGE Publications Inc.
  24. Hamdouni, A. (2010). Ownership, board structure, and corporate performance: Evidence of French VC-backed firms. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 6(3), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv6i3art1
  25. Handa, R. (2018). Does corporate governance affect financial performance: A study of select Indian banks? Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(4), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.84.478.486
  26. Haryono, U., & Paminto, A. (2015). Corporate governance and firm value: The mediating effect of financial performance and firm risk. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(35), 18–24. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/download/27492/28207
  27. Heggede, S., & Jadhav, A. M. (2021). Regulatory changes and role of audit committee : Indian evidence. Indian Journal of Finance, 15(3), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2021/v15i3/158126
  28. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729
  29. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00179
  30. Hsu, C.-S., Lai, W.-H., & Yen, S.-H. (2019). Boardroom diversity and operating performance: The moderating effect of strategic change. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(11), 2448–2472. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1519414
  31. Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India's top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x
  32. Jain, S., Dhillon, L. K., Aggarwal, R., & Bagga, T. (2023). Corporate governance mechanism, ownership structure, and firm performance : Evidence from India. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(9), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i9/173182
  33. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
  34. Kalantonis, P., Schoina, S., & Kallandranis, C. (2023). The impact of the corporate governance on firm performance: Evidence from the Greek listed firms [Special Issue]. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i3siart7
  35. Kamaliah. (2020). Disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its implications on company value as a result of the impact of corporate governance and profitability. International Journal of Law and Management, 62(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-08-2017-0197
  36. Kapil, S., & Mishra, R. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from India. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9(6), 2033–2069. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.96129
  37. Khan, A., Tanveer, S., & Malik, U. (2017). An empirical analysis of corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from KSE-100 Index. Accounting, 3(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2016.7.003
  38. Khan, H., Khan, S. Z., Khan, F. A., Yaqub, K. Q., & Bangash, S. A. (2024). Nexus between corporate governance, capital structure, and market volatility on corporate financial performance. Policy Research Journal, 2(4), 643–653. https://policyresearchjournal.com/index.php/1/article/view/114
  39. Khan, S. N., Hussain, R. I., Ur-Rehman, S., Maqbool, M. Q., Ali, E. I., & Numan, M. (2019). The mediating role of innovation between corporate governance and organizational performance: Moderating role of innovative culture in Pakistan textile sector. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), Article ID 1631018. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1631018
  40. Khongmalai, O., & Distanont, A. (2017). Corporate governance model in Thai state-owned enterprises: Structural equation modelling approach. Corporate Governance, 17(4), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-01-2016-0021
  41. Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00318
  42. Kiran, A. S., & Ramesh, K. (2021). Impact of ownership structure on dividend policies of Indian non-financial firms. Indian Journal of Finance, 15(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2021/v15i2/157639
  43. Kumar, N., & Singh, J. P. (2013). Effect of board size and promoter ownership on firm value: Some empirical findings from India. Corporate Governance, 13(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311302431 520
  44. Kumar, N., & Sudesh. (2019). Does corporate governance affect bank performance? Empirical evidence from India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 12(3), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i3/142337
  45. Kumar, R. (2011). Governance and trusteeship philosophy in the 2 G saga. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 4(4), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2011/v4i4/62411
  46. Kumar, R., & Chandel, K. (2010). Nurturing corporate culture with the wisdom of the GITA - A gateway for good governance. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 3(7), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2010/v3i7/61059
  47. Kumar, R., & Verma, Y. (2011). Ethical dimensions of corporate governance in the neoliberal era. Amity Global Business Review, 6(1), 91–104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378109098_Ethical_Dimensions_of_Corporate_Governance_in_the_Neoliberal_Era
  48. Ledi, K. K., & Ameza - Xemalordzo, E. (2023). Rippling effect of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergy on firm performance: The mediating role of corporate image. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), Article ID 2210353. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2210353
  49. Lehmann, N. (2019). Do corporate governance analysts matter? Evidence from the expansion of governance analyst coverage. Journal of Accounting Research, 57(3), 721–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12254
  50. Lew, Y. K., Yu, J., & Park, J.-Y. (2018). The impacts of independent director and CEO duality on performance in the Chinese post‐institutional‐transition era. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 35(4), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1468
  51. Li, Z., Crook, J., Andreeva, G., & Tang, Y. (2021). Predicting the risk of financial distress using corporate governance measures. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, Article ID 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101334
  52. Lusy, B., & Riduwan, A. (2020). Financial performance and value of SOEs: Seen from good corporate governance, intellectual capital, and corporate social responsibility. SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 7(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V7I1P102
  53. Mahrani, M., & Soewarno, N. (2018). The effect of good corporate governance mechanism and corporate social responsibility on financial performance with earnings management as mediating variable. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajar-06-2018-0008
  54. Makki, M. A., & Lodhi, S. A. (2013). Impact of corporate governance on financial performance. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 33(2), 265–280. https://pjss.bzu.edu.pk/index.php/pjss/article/view/196
  55. Malik, M. S., & Makhdoom, D. D. (2016). Does corporate governance beget firm performance in Fortune Global 500 companies? Corporate Governance, 16(4), 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-12-2015-0156
  56. Negi, G., & Jain, A. (2022). Corporate governance and firm value – An empirical study of financial services firms in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 16(9), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2022/v16i9/172159
  57. Nguyen, H., & Faff, R. (2007). Impact of board size and board diversity on firm value: Australian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv4i2p2
  58. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x
  59. Pamungkas, I. D., Purwantoro, Sari, M. P., & Hersugondo. (2023). Corporate governance and financial performance on firm value: The case of Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 20, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.10
  60. Pandey, N., Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., Gupta, P., & Ali, S. (2023). Board diversity and firm performance: The role of contextual variables. British Journal of Management, 34(4), 1920–1947. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12675
  61. Pandya, H. (2011). Corporate governance structures and financial performance of selected Indian bank. Journal of Management & Public Policy, 2(2), 4–21. http://jmpp.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Hemal-Pandya.pdf
  62. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/books/external-control-organizations-resource-dependence-perspective
  63. Sandhya, S., & Parashar, N. (2019). A study on corporate governance practices of selected banks in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 13(2), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2019/v13i2/141686
  64. Sarwar, A., Al-Faryan, M. A., & Saleem, M. (2022). Corporate governance and corporate performance with a mediating role of corporate social responsibility—Case study of companies listed on Saudi Arabian Exchange. Theoretical Economics Letters, 12(4), 1137–1175. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2022.124062
  65. Satish, D., & Satyanarayana, S. V. (2018). Firm value and its non-linear relationship with endogenous promoter ownership in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 12(6), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2018/v12i6/128107
  66. Satrio, A. B. (2022). Corporate governance perception index and firm performance in Indonesia. Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 37(2), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.24856/mem.v37i2.2884
  67. Sharma, M., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Corporate governance practices in Indian banking sector: A study of public and private sector banks. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 9(2), 414–427. http://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR22B1884.pdf
  68. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329497
  69. Singh, R. K., & Chauhan, M. R. (2022a). Evaluation of corporate governance practices of public sector companies in India. Positif Journal, 22(7), 358–366. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364994406
  70. Singh, R. K., & Chauhan, M. R. (2022b). Ownership pattern and financial performance – corporate governance linkages: An empirical study of public sector companies in India. Positif Journal, 22(7), 608–626. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364994528
  71. Singh, R. K., Kumar, A., & Singh, Y. (2024). Mapping the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Indian economy: Insights from the smart PLS-SEM approach with IPMA. Indian Journal of Finance, 18(7), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2024/v18i7/174031
  72. Singh, R. K., Kumar, N., & Kumar, A. (2023a). Impact of corporate governance practices on financial performance of listed companies in India. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 10(4), 87–104. http://www.ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR23D2993.pdf
  73. Singh, R. K., Kumar, N., & Kumar, A. (2023b). Impact of corporate governance practices on economic and market value addition of Indian public and private sector companies. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 10(4), 105–121. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Raj-Singh-2/publication/376848522
  74. Singh, R. K., Sharma, M., Kumar, A., & Singh, Y. (2022). Corporate governance mechanism – financial performance nexus: Empirical evidence from Indian banks. Indian Journal of Finance, 16(7), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2022/v16i7/170633
  75. Singh, R., Bansal, R., Gupta, N., & Srivastava, S. K. (2020). Corporate governance in Indian banking sector: An analysis. Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, 12(2), 476–493. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHolWQiWpLb_x5JsZsSMw2r21YAs-Xsy/view
  76. Singh, S., Tabassum, N., Darwish, T. K., & Batsakis, G. (2018). Corporate governance and Tobin's Q as a measure of organizational performance. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12237
  77. Sitorus, T., & Sitorus, T. V. (2017). Good corporate governance and firm value: The role of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4–1), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c1art14
  78. Sucuahi, W., & Cambarihan, J. M. (2016). Influence of profitability to the firm value of diversified companies in the Philippines. Accounting and Finance Research, 5(2), 149–153. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v5n2p149
  79. Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M., & Omi, Y. (2010). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Japanese manufacturing industries after the lost decade. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.021
  80. Thomas, A. E., Bhaumik, A., & Aruja, J. M. (2023). The impact of corporate governance practices on firm-level innovations and their market value: Empirical evidence from India. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(11), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i11/170424
  81. Tiep Le, T., & Nguyen, V. K. (2022). The impact of corporate governance on firms' value in an emerging country: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility and organisational identification. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), Article ID 2018907. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.2018907
  82. Valenti, M. A., Luce, R., & Mayfield, C. (2011). The effects of firm performance on corporate governance. Management Research Review, 34(3), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111116295
  83. Venkatraman, K., & Selvam, M. (2014). Impact of corporate governance practices and firm performance: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Finance, 8(12), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i12/71691
  84. Voinea, C. L., Rauf, F., Naveed, K., & Fratostiteanu, C. (2022). The impact of CEO duality and financial performance on CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from state-owned enterprises in China. Journal of Risk Financial Management, 15(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15010037
  85. Wahyuni, P. D., & Mahliza, F. (2019). Effect of GCG and financial performance on the quality of internet financial reporting. Economics and Accounting Journal, 2(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.32493/eaj.v2i1.y2019.p52-62
  86. Wijethilake, C., & Ekanayake, A. (2020). CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of CEO informal power and board involvements. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1453–1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2018-0321
  87. Zabukovšek, S. S., Bobek, S., Zabukovšek, U., Kalinić, Z., & Tominc, P. (2022). Enhancing PLS-SEM-enabled research with ANN and IPMA: Research study of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems' acceptance based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Mathematics, 10(9), 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10091379.
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJF

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines