New IJF now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Indian Journal of Finance logo

Indian Journal of Finance

ISSN: 0973-8711 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2007 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

XBRL Adoption and Information Asymmetry : Evidence from the Indian Capital Market

Sushant Gupta1,  Ajay Chandel2,  Lalit Bhalla3

1 Assistant Professor, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara - 144 411, Punjab

2 Assistant Professor, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara - 144 411, Punjab

3 Associate Professor, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara - 144 411, Punjab

Volume 17
Issue 7
Pages 25–36
Year 2023
Received: Sept. 25, 2022 Accepted: May 30, 2023 Published: July 1, 2023
Abstract

Purpose: The study was conducted in the context of the Indian capital market to find out the effect of adopting XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) on the reduction of information asymmetry and the impact of XBRL on the trading volume of the market.

Methodology: In the current study, trading volume has been taken as the proxy variable to study the impact of XBRL adoption on information asymmetry. The study focused on the pre-and postadoption XBRL effect on information asymmetry, followed by the influence of the implementation of XBRL, which is measured by taking the trading volume of the Indian capital market as a proxy variable. Data for 270 listed firms were collected for this research during a 20-year period, from 2001–2020, including 11 years before the implementation of XBRL and 9 years after it.

Findings: There is a significant difference in the information asymmetry pre- and post-adoption of XBRL by Indian listed firms. A strong positive and significant relationship has been found between XBRL and the trading volume of the Indian capital market due to a reduction in information asymmetry.Practical

Implications: Listed companies might increase investments by offering their stakeholders XBRL-enabled software and services. Regulatory authorities can also enable companies to disclose reports that are useful to decision-making stakeholders according to the XBRL taxonomy. The adoption of XBRL helps reduce information asymmetry, increase companies’ valuation, and lower the cost of capital.

Originality: This study contributes to the financial reporting and Indian capital markets fields. This study contributes to the literature by identifying the impact on Indian capital markets post-adoption of XBRL.

Keywords XBRL corporate reporting information asymmetry Indian capital market
How to Cite

Sushant Gupta, Ajay Chandel, Lalit Bhalla (2023). XBRL Adoption and Information Asymmetry : Evidence from the Indian Capital Market. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(7), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i7/170240

References
  1. Ante, L. (2020). Bitcoin transactions, information asymmetry and trading volume. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 4(3), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2020017
  2. Antoniou, A., Ergul, N., Holmes, P., & Priestley, R. (1997). Technical analysis, trading volume and market efficiency: Evidence from an emerging market. Applied Financial Economics, 7(4), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/096031097333475
  3. Bhattacharjee, S., & Swaminathan, A. M. (2016). Stock market integration of India with rest of the world: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Finance, 10(5), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2016/v10i5/92934
  4. Blankespoor, E., Miller, B. P., & White, H. D. (2014). Initial evidence on the market impact of the XBRL mandate. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(4), 1468–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9273-4
  5. Brown Jr., W. D., & Fernando, G. D. (2011). Whisper forecasts of earnings per share: Is anyone still listening? Journal of Business Research, 64(5), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.04.001
  6. Clarke, J., & Shastri, K. (2000). On information asymmetry metrics. Available at SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.251938
  7. Cong, Y., Hao, J., & Zou, L. (2014). The impact of XBRL reporting on market efficiency. Journal of Information Systems, 28(2), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50794
  8. Debreceny, R., & Gray, G. L. (2001). The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2(1), 47–74. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1467-0895(00)00012-9
  9. Deepak, R., & Gowda, S. (2014). Informational asymmetry between informed and retail investors while investing in the Indian IPO market. Indian Journal of Finance, 8(9), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i9/71850
  10. Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04620.x
  11. Dixit, A., & Jain, S. (2023). Contemporary approaches to analyze non-stationary time-series: Some solutions and challenges. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications (Formerly: Recent Patents on Computer Science), 16(2), Article e230522205121. https://doi.org/10.2174/2666255815666220523125447
  12. Easley, D., Hvidkjaer, S., & O’Hara, M. (2002). Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2185–2221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00493
  13. Eckbo, B. E., & Norli, Ø. (2005). Liquidity risk, leverage and long-run IPO returns. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.02.002
  14. Ellili, N. O. (2022). Impact of ESG disclosure and financial reporting quality on investment efficiency. Corporate Governance, 22(5), 1094–1111. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2021- 0209
  15. Goel, A., Tripathi, V., & Agarwal, M. (2021). Information asymmetry and stock returns. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 18(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2020-0084
  16. Gupta, S., & Bhalla, L. (2022). Impact of integrated reporting on firm value: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 14(4), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSOC.2022.127983
  17. Heflin, F. L., Shaw, K. W., & Wild, J. J. (2005). Disclosure policy and market liquidity: Impact of depth quotes and order sizes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 829–865. https://doi.org/10.1506/EETM-FALM-4KDD-9DT9
  18. Hodge, F. D., Kennedy, J. J., & Maines, L. A. (2004). Does search-facilitating technology improve the transparency of financial reporting? The Accounting Review, 79(3), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.3.687
  19. Kumar, S., Tiwari, A. K., Chauhan, Y., & Ji, Q. (2019). Dependence structure between the BRICS foreign exchange and stock markets using the dependence-switching copula approach. International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 273-284. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.12.011
  20. Lakhal, F. (2008). Stock market liquidity and information asymmetry around voluntary earnings disclosures: New evidence from France. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 4(1), 60–75. http://doi.org/10.1108/17439130810837384
  21. Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91–124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672910
  22. Liu, C., & O'Farrell, G. (2013). The role of accounting values in the relation between XBRL and forecast accuracy. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 21(4), 297–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-03-2013-0023
  23. Liu, C., Luo, X., & Wang, F. L. (2017). An empirical investigation on the impact of XBRL adoption on information asymmetry: Evidence from Europe. Decision Support Systems, 93, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.09.004
  24. Luo, X., Wang, T., Yang, L., Zhao, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Initial evidence on the market impact of the iXBRL adoption. Accounting Horizons, 37(1), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-2020-023
  25. Mwambuli, E. L. (2015). What determine corporate capital structure in developing economies? Evidence from East African stock markets. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(12), 221–239.
  26. Seyhun, H. N. (1986). Insiders’ profits, costs of trading, and market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 16(2), 189-212. http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)9006
  27. Sharma, P., & Gupta, S. (2019). A comparative study on effect of IFRS on profitability of selected companies in developed and developing countries. Indian Journal of Finance, 13(6), 65–73. http://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2019/v13i6/144852
  28. Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148681
  29. Vander Bauwhede, H., De Meyere, M., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). Financial reporting quality and the cost of debt of SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9645-1
  30. Wang, J. (1993). A model of intertemporal asset prices under asymmetric information. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(2), 249–282. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298057
  31. Yen, J.-C., & Wang, T. (2015). The association between XBRL adoption and market reactions to earnings surprises. Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51039
  32. Yoon, H., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2011). Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry? Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2010.01.008
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJF

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines