Dynamic Interconnectedness and Risk Transmission in Green, Clean Energy, and Sustainable Markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2025/v19i12/175876Keywords:
dynamic interconnectedness, spillover effects, clean energy markets, green bonds, green markets, sustainable markets, sustainable finance.JEL Classification Codes : C58, Q02, Q40, Q56
Publication Chronology: Paper Submission Date : July 1, 2025 ; Paper sent back for Revision : November 13, 2025 ; Paper Acceptance Date : November 20, 2025 ; Paper Published Online : December 15, 2025
Abstract
Purpose : This study investigated the spillover effect and dynamic interconnectedness among green, clean, and sustainable markets. It identified the markets that are key transmitters and receivers, and it offered insights for investors and policymakers to optimize portfolio strategies and regulatory measures.
Design/Methodology/Approach : The study employed the DY and BK models to analyze time frequency spillovers. Using the daily data, spillover was assessed across three time horizons that is short term (1–4 days), medium term (4–10 days), and long term (more than 10 days) to understand risk transmission.
Findings : The results revealed that clean energy markets were the strongest transmitters of shocks, particularly in the medium and long terms; whereas, sustainable markets came out to be the largest receiver of shocks, with the highest vulnerability in the long term. Green Bonds (GB) and Carbon markets exhibited moderate spillover. Short-term spillover offered diversification opportunities; however, long-term spillovers were significant for risk mitigation.
Practical Implication : Investors are recommended to balance their exposure between high-transmitting (clean energy) and high-receiving (sustainable market). This helps to optimize the risk-adjusted returns. GB are suitable for hedging as short-term spillovers offer better diversification opportunities.
Originality/Value : The study contributed to existing financial research by analyzing volatility spillover among green, clean energy, and sustainable markets. Markets choose and use advanced econometric tools to provide a time–frequency-based risk assessment to investors and policymakers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
1) Almutairi, K., Dehshiri, S. J., Dehshiri, S. S., Hoa, A. X., Dhanraj, J. A., Mostafaeipour, A., Issakhov, A., & Techato, K. (2023). Blockchain technology application challenges in renewable energy supply chain management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(28), 72041–72058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18311-7
2) Alzoubi, Y. I., & Mishra, A. (2023). Green blockchain – A move towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 430, Article ID 139541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139541
3) Arfaoui, N., Naeem, M. A., Boubaker, S., Mirza, N., & Karim, S. (2023). Interdependence of clean energy and green markets with cryptocurrencies. Energy Economics, 120, Article ID 106584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106584
4) Axelsen, H., Rasmussen, U., Jensen, J. R., Ross, O., & Henglein, F. (2023). Trading green bonds using distributed ledger technology. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4420803
5) Baker, M. P., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2018). Financing the response to climate change: The pricing and ownership of U.S. green bonds. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3275327
6) Baruník, J., & Křehlík, T. (2018). Measuring the frequency dynamics of financial connectedness and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 16(2), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nby001
7) Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008
8) Chen, G., Han, J., & Yuan, H. (2022). Urban digital economy development, enterprise innovation, and ESG performance in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955055
9) Dayal, S., Soni, T. K., Aggarwal, R., & Hotwani, R. (2024). Linking ESG disclosure to firm performance and risk: An international perspective. Indian Journal of Finance, 18(11), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2024/v18i11/174641
10) Dias, R., Teixeira, N., Alexandre, P., & Chambino, M. (2023). Exploring the connection between clean and dirty energy: Implications for the transition to a carbon-resilient economy. Energies, 16(13), 4982. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16134982
11) Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2009). Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. The Economic Journal, 119(534), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x
12) Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006
13) Dwibedi, P., Pahi, D., & Mishra, A. P. (2025). Corporate environmental, social, and governance disclosure and performance dynamics: An empirical analysis of BRICS nations. Indian Journal of Finance, 19(2), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2025/v19i2/174769
14) Elsayed, A. H., Billah, M., Goodell, J. W., & Hadhri, S. (2024). Examining connections between the fourth industrial revolution and energy markets. Energy Economics, 133, Article ID 107476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107476
15) Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
16) Fu, T., & Li, J. (2023). An empirical analysis of the impact of ESG on financial performance: The moderating role of digital transformation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1256052
17) Gupta, K., Raman, T. V., Deol, O. S., & Gupta, K. (2022). Environment, social, and governance performance and firm risk: A study of the Indian consumer goods sector. Indian Journal of Finance, 16(8), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2022/v16i8/171373
18) Hachenberg, B., & Schiereck, D. (2018). Are green bonds priced differently from conventional bonds? Journal of Asset Management, 19(6), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-018-0088-5
19) Hasan, M. B., Uddin, G. S., Ali, M. S., Rashid, M. M., Park, D., & Kang, S. H. (2024). Examining time–frequency quantile dependence between green bond and green equity markets. Financial Innovation, 10(1), Article no. 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00641-3
20) Hauman, H., & Shah, M. (2022). Seeking scale: The role of physical commodity markets in delivering carbon removals. Trafigura Group. https://www.trafigura.com/media/t5vh2bit/2022_trafigura_seeking_scale_physical_commodity_markets.pdf
21) Ikram, M., Ferasso, M., Sroufe, R., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Assessing green technology indicators for cleaner production and sustainable investments in a developing country context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 322, Article ID 129090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129090
22) International Energy Agency. (2022). Renewable electricity — Renewables 2022. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2022/renewable-electricity
23) Khera, A., Goyal, A., & Yadav, M. P. (2022). Capturing the stock market volatility: A study of sectoral indices in India using symmetric GARCH models. International Journal of Management Practice, 15(6), 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmp.2022.126536
24) Kozar, Ł., & Wodnicka, M. (2024). Blockchain in energy: Literature review in the context of sustainability. Economics and Environment, 90(3), 866. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.90.3.866
25) Křehlík, T., & Baruník, J. (2017). Cyclical properties of supply-side and demand-side shocks in oil-based commodity markets. Energy Economics, 65, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.003
26) Kuang, W. (2021). Are clean energy assets a safe haven for international equity markets? Journal of Cleaner Production, 302, Article ID 127006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127006
27) Le, T. H. (2023). Quantile time-frequency connectedness between cryptocurrency volatility and renewable energy volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic and Ukraine–Russia conflicts. Renewable Energy, 202, 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.062
28) Mahajan, A., & Pathak, R. (2025). Decarbonizing development: Green and sustainable bonds in mitigating emissions in Asian countries. Indian Journal of Finance, 19(8), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2025/v19i8/175233
29) Makkar, M. K., Ghayas, A., & Gupta, N. (2023). Performance of conventional and sustainable index in pre and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(5), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i5/172736
30) Mercuri, L., Perchiazzo, A., & Rroji, E. (2023). Investigating short-term dynamics in green bond markets. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.12179
31) Minimol, M. C., Akhila, K. V., & Kavya, N. P. (2025). Firm performance in India: Does sustainability reporting matter? Indian Journal of Finance, 19(3), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2025/v19i3/174847
32) Mohammed, K. S., Usman, M., Ahmad, P., & Bulgamaa, U. (2023). Do all renewable energy stocks react to the war in Ukraine? Russo–Ukrainian conflict perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 36782–36793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24833-5
33) Naeem, M. A., Adekoya, O. B., & Oliyide, J. A. (2021). Asymmetric spillovers between green bonds and commodities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, Article ID 128100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128100
34) Naeem, M. A., Bouri, E., Costa, M. D., Naifar, N., & Shahzad, S. J. (2021). Energy markets and green bonds: A tail dependence analysis with time-varying optimal copulas and portfolio implications. Resources Policy, 74, Article ID 102418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102418
35) Naeem, M. A., Conlon, T., & Cotter, J. (2022). Green bonds and other assets: Evidence from extreme risk transmission. Journal of Environmental Management, 305, Article ID 114358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114358
36) Naeem, M. A., Husain, A., Bossman, A., & Karim, S. (2024). Assessing the linkage of energy cryptocurrency with clean and dirty energy markets. Energy Economics, 130, Article ID 107279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107279
37) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Green finance and investment. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/24090344
38) Ozkan, O., Adebayo, T. S., & Usman, O. (2024). Dynamic connectedness of clean energy markets, green markets, and sustainable markets: The role of climate policy uncertainty. Energy, 303, Article ID 131957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131957
39) Pham, L. (2021). Frequency connectedness and cross-quantile dependence between green bond and green equity markets. Energy Economics, 98, Article ID 105257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105257
40) Ren, B., & Lucey, B. (2022). A clean, green haven? Examining the relationship between clean energy, clean and dirty cryptocurrencies. Energy Economics, 109, Article ID 105951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105951
41) Rezec, M., & Scholtens, B. (2017). Financing energy transformation: The role of renewable energy equity indices. International Journal of Green Energy, 14(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2016.1261704
42) Sahoo, S., & Kumar, S. (2023). Volatility spillover among the sectoral indices of the Indian capital market: Evidence from the COVID period. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(9), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i9/173183
43) Santhi, P., Sasirekha, P., & Anija, J. (2024). A causal linkage between corporate sustainability performance and financial performance of select IT & ITeS companies in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 18(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2024/v18i2/173520
44) Shetty, R., & Ashalatha, K. (2022). Sustainability reporting of Indian companies and the adherence to GRI disclosure framework. Indian Journal of Finance, 16(9), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2022/v16i9/172160
45) Singh, A. K., Shrivastav, R. K., & Chapagain, R. (2024). Sustainable financing initiatives and bank performance: A bibliometric analysis. Indian Journal of Finance, 18(8), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2024/v18i8/174241
46) Soloviov, N. (2023). Financing of the energy transition in developing countries. In L. Ivascu, A. Artene, & M. Pislaru (eds.), Monetary policies and sustainable businesses. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.113040
47) Soni, T. K. (2023). ESG score and mutual fund performance: Empirical evidence from India. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(3), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i3/172671
48) Sonia, & Narwal, K. P. (2023). Volatility spillover in the Indian commodity market: A comparative assessment of various commodity segments. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i2/169193
49) Swaty. (2023). Green finance and sustainable development: Exploring dynamic causal links and global implications. E3S Web of Conferences, 453, Article no. 01053. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345301053
50) Tang, D. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Do shareholders benefit from green bonds? Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, Article ID 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.12.001
51) Tiwari, A. K., Aikins Abakah, E. J., Gabauer, D., & Dwumfour, R. A. (2021). Green bond, renewable energy stocks and carbon price: Dynamic connectedness, hedging and investment strategies during COVID-19 pandemic. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897284
52) Truby, J. (2018). Decarbonizing Bitcoin: Law and policy choices for reducing the energy consumption of blockchain technologies and digital currencies. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.009
53) Yadav, M. P., Pandey, A., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Arya, V., & Mishra, N. (2023). Volatility spillover of green bond with renewable energy and crypto market. Renewable Energy, 212, 928–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.056
54) Yadav, M., Mishra, N., & Ashok, S. (2023). Dynamic connectedness of green bond with financial markets of European countries under OECD economies. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(1), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09430-3
55) Yousaf, I., Riaz, Y., & Goodell, J. W. (2023). Energy cryptocurrencies: Assessing connectedness with other asset classes. Finance Research Letters, 52, Article ID 103389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103389
56) Zheng, T., Zhang, H., & Ye, S. (2024). Monetary policies on green financial markets: Evidence from a multi-moment connectedness network. Energy Economics, 136, Article ID 107739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107739