Geopolitical Risk Forecasting for Indian Agricultural Commodity Markets

Authors

  •   Vaishnavi D. Research Scholar, Manipal Institute of Commerce Finance and Economics, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2614-2871
  •   B. R. Santosh Professor (Corresponding Author), Manipal Institute of Commerce Finance and Economics, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-1487
  •   Guruprasad Desai Assistant Professor, Manipal Institute of Commerce Finance and Economics, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-4618

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2026/v20i7/176066

Keywords:

geopolitical risk, agricultural commodities, price forecasting, machine learning, volatility spillover, India, emerging markets.
JEL Classification Codes :C45, C53, G15, Q02, Q11
Publication Chronology: Paper Submission Date : September 20, 2025 ; Paper sent back for Revision : May 20, 2026 ; Paper Acceptance Date : June 20, 2026 ; Paper Published Online : July 15, 2026.

Abstract

Purpose : In this study, we investigated whether a geopolitical risk index (GRI) was a better predictor of Indian commodity prices than traditional econometric models and whether machine-learning models could have improved forecasting performance relative to conventional econometric approaches.

Methodology : In India, the daily wholesale prices of cotton and turmeric were analyzed using the Caldara and Iacoviello global GRI. Risk transmission was quantified using measures of Granger causality and connectedness analysis. Three machine-learning architectures were estimated in both plain and risk-augmented variants and compared with linear econometric benchmarks. The accuracy of the forecasts was evaluated on a held-out partition and was also tested using a rolling-origin cross-validation approach.

Findings : Geopolitical risk was a significant predictor of turmeric prices, but not cotton prices, which is perhaps understandable given that cotton benefits from government price-support mechanisms. For both commodities, the models based on recurrent neural networks were superior to the gradient boosting and linear benchmark models, and adding a geopolitical risk variable enhanced the accuracy of forecasts in almost all models evaluated.

Practical Implications : There is a potential for the inclusion of geopolitical risk indicators in commodity price monitoring systems in emerging markets, with special emphasis on commodities that trade in open, unregulated markets where the predictive relationship was clearly established.

Originality : The study provided evidence of geopolitical risk transmission to structurally contrasting Indian agricultural commodities using daily-frequency data and compared the forecasting performance of machine-learning and econometric models in the context of risk augmentation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

D., V., Santosh, B. R., & Desai, G. (2026). Geopolitical Risk Forecasting for Indian Agricultural Commodity Markets. Indian Journal of Finance, 20(7), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2026/v20i7/176066

Issue

Section

Articles

References

1) Abdelhamid, A. A., Alhussan, A. A., Qenawy, A.-S., Osman, A. M., Elshewey, A. M., & Eed, M. (2025). Potato harvesting prediction using an improved ResNet-59 model. Potato Research, 68(2), 1049–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11540-024-09773-6

2) Agarwal, S. (2022). Deep learning in financial analytics: Exchange rate modeling. Indian Journal of Finance, 16(9), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2022/v16i9/172157

3) Ahamed, T., Tallapalli, N. K., Akula, P., & Kumar, S. (2026). Global commodities and the Indian stock market: A post-pandemic volatility spillover analysis. Indian Journal of Finance, 20(2), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2026/v20i2/175359

4) Ahmed, H., Alam, N., & Berwal, K. (2026). Tracking turbulence: High-frequency evidence on oil-driven market volatility in India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 19(5), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2026/v19i5/174598

5) Alfeus, M., & Nikitopoulos, C. S. (2022). Forecasting volatility in commodity markets with long-memory models. Journal of Commodity Markets, 28, Article ID 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2022.100248

6) Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Gabauer, D. (2020). Refined measures of dynamic connectedness based on time-varying parameter vector autoregressions. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(4), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13040084

7) Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1

8) Bonato, M., Cepni, O., Gupta, R., & Pierdzioch, C. (2024). Forecasting the realized volatility of agricultural commodity prices: Does sentiment matter? Journal of Forecasting, 43(6), 2088–2125. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3106

9) Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823

10) Ceballos, F., Kannan, S., & Kramer, B. (2021). Crop prices, farm incomes, and food security during the COVID‐19 pandemic in India: Phone‐based producer survey evidence from Haryana state. Agricultural Economics, 52(3), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12633

11) Cermák, M., Malec, K., & Maitah, M. (2017). Price volatility modelling – wheat: GARCH model application. Agris On-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 9(4), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2017.090402

12) Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

13) Chowdhury, M. A., Abdullah, M., Abakah, E. J., & Tiwari, A. K. (2025). Geopolitical risk and energy market tail risk forecasting: An explainable machine learning approach. Journal of Commodity Markets, 39, Article ID 100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2025.100478

14) Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3555

15) Countryman, A. M., Litvinov, V., Kolodiazhnyi, I., Bogonos, M., & Nivievskyi, O. (2025). Global economic effects of war‐induced agricultural export declines from Ukraine. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 47(2), 624–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13468

16) Dharavath, R., & Khosla, E. (2019). Seasonal ARIMA to forecast fruits and vegetable agricultural prices. In Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Smart Electronic Systems, ISES 2019 (pp. 47–52). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSES47678.2019.00023

17) Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348

18) Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524599

19) Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012). Better to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers. International Journal of Forecasting, 28(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006

20) Du, X., & Dong, F. (2023). Agricultural policy uncertainty and its impact on commodity markets. Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 2(2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaa2.56

21) Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773

22) Foglia, M., Palomba, G., & Tedeschi, M. (2023). Disentangling the geopolitical risk and its effects on commodities. Evidence from a panel of G8 countries. Resources Policy, 85, Article ID 104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104056

23) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). The importance of Ukraine and the Russian Federation for global agricultural markets and the risks associated with the war in Ukraine. FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/cb9013en/cb9013en.pdf

24) Gong, X., & Xu, J. (2022). Geopolitical risk and dynamic connectedness between commodity markets. Energy Economics, 110, Article ID 106028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106028

25) Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791

26) Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

27) Hudecová, K., & Rajčániová, M. (2023). The impact of geopolitical risk on agricultural commodity prices. Agricultural Economics, 69(4), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.17221/374/2022-AGRICECON

28) Karkowska, R., & Urjasz, S. (2024). Importance of geopolitical risk in volatility structure: New evidence from biofuels, crude oil, and grains commodity markets. Journal of Commodity Markets, 36, Article ID 100440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100440

29) Kushwah, S. V., & Negi, P. (2024). Covid-19 pandemic and volatility spillover effects on foreign exchange rates. Indian Journal of Finance, 18(6), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2024/v18i6/173966

30) Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y

31) Lethesh, M., & Reddy, C. V. (2023). Price discovery mechanism in the Indian agricultural commodity futures market: An empirical analysis. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(12), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i12/172823

32) Manogna, R. L., Dharmaji, V., & Sarang, S. (2025). A novel hybrid neural network-based volatility forecasting of agricultural commodity prices: Empirical evidence from India. Journal of Big Data, 12(1), Article no. 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01131-8

33) Mudhalvan, S., Rajeswari, S., Mahalingam, L., Jeyakumar, P., Muthuswami, M., & Premalatha, N. (2021). Causation studies for Kapas yield, yield components and lint quality

traits in Mexican cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Environment Conservation Journal, 22(3), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2021.22341

34) Naik, C., & Mohan, B. C. (2025). Role of agricultural marketing channels in price realization: An empirical analysis of selected crops in India. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 15(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-11-2022-0257

35) Nayak, G. H., Alam, M. W., Singh, K. N., Avinash, G., Kumar, R. R., Ray, M., & Deb, C. K. (2024). Exogenous variable driven deep learning models for improved price forecasting of TOP crops in India. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article no. 17203. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68040-3

36) Palomba, G., & Tedeschi, M. (2025). Geopolitical risks' spillovers across countries and on commodity markets: A dynamic analysis. Energy Research Letters, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.46557/001c.121262

37) Ray, S., Lama, A., Mishra, P., Biswas, T., Sankar Das, S., & Gurung, B. (2023). An ARIMA-LSTM model for predicting volatile agricultural price series with random forest technique. Applied Soft Computing, 149, Article ID 110939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110939

38) Ren, X., Wang, T., Liu, Z., & Xu, H. (2025). The risk transmission mechanism between Geopolitical risks and the international agricultural product market: An analysis based on the cross-quantilogram and TVP-VAR-BK Models. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article no. 1799. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06072-4

39) Saâdaoui, F., Ben Jabeur, S., & Goodell, J. W. (2022). Causality of geopolitical risk on food prices: Considering the Russo–Ukrainian conflict. Finance Research Letters, 49, Article ID 103103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103103

40) Sahoo, S., & Kumar, S. (2023). Volatility spillover among the sectoral indices of the Indian capital market: Evidence from the COVID period. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(9), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i9/173183

41) Shahzad, F., Bouri, E., Mokni, K., & Ajmi, A. N. (2021). Energy, agriculture, and precious metals: Evidence from time-varying Granger causal relationships for both return and volatility. Resources Policy, 74, Article ID 102298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102298

42) Singh, R. K., Sharma, T., Singh, Y., Kumar, A., & Kumar, S. (2025). Modeling asymmetric volatility connectedness and spillover dynamics in emerging forex markets through the lens of a TVP-VAR framework. Indian Journal of Finance, 19(10), 8–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2025/v19i10/175677

43) Singha, U. S., Singh, N. B., & Mutum, K. (2024). Indian commodity derivatives market: Structural breaks and price discovery. Indian Journal of Finance, 18(8), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2024/v18i8/174240

44) Sonia, & Narwal, K. P. (2023). Volatility spillover in the Indian commodity market: A comparative assessment of various commodity segments. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i2/169193

45) Zhang, H., Jin, C., Bouri, E., Gao, W., & Xu, Y. (2023). Realized higher-order moments spillovers between commodity and stock markets: Evidence from China. Journal of Commodity Markets, 30, Article ID 100275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2022.100275